***No Spoilers***
It is not unusual for a masterpiece to have its flaws. In
fact, some would say it comes with the territory. So it’s not a surprise that
the science depicted in the new Chris Nolan film “Interstellar” has been subjected
to a little criticism from those who know about such things, despite having the
benefit of the advice of one of the most respected physicists on the planet.
Apparently, according to some experts, it would not be
possible for any planet to orbit a black hole as closely as the film suggests
without being ripped to pieces by the gravity. A spacecraft could not approach the
superheated accretion disc without being vaporised. And so on.
But does any of that really matter? After all, most of the
science in Interstellar is actually pretty good; dare I say it: light years
ahead of most science fiction movies. And I’m not a scientist anyway, and I
suspect, neither are you or most of the rest of the audience. I just want to
see a good story that gives great entertainment, and maybe something to think
about as well.
On that score, there’s plenty to chew on in Interstellar.
If you’re expecting a space opera, or an action flick, this
is not the film for you. It takes all of the first act (about 45 minutes, because
it’s a LONG movie) before the action even gets off the ground. Instead, the
opening act establishes Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) as a former NASA test pilot who is now a farmer in a post
disaster world where food is in short supply and farmers are sorely needed.
Director Nolan
lingers on this opening act to ram home the message of environmental destruction,
but more importantly for this story, the bond Cooper has with the two children he
is raising as a single father. The younger child, his daughter Murphy, is
especially close to her father and it is this relationship which ultimately
becomes the central theme of the film, as well as a pivotal part of the plot
structure.
Given the
importance of this relationship, it is understandable that Nolan has put so
much effort into portraying the emotions involved, especially when Cooper must
choose between staying with his family, or leaving them behind to pilot NASA’s
last spaceship on a mission that could save all humanity.
When Cooper is
reunited with a former colleague, Professor Brand (Michael Caine), he learns
that a wormhole was discovered decades previously near the orbit of Saturn. (A
wormhole, which is a genuine feature of physics as we understand it, links
otherwise distant points in space and time.) In this case, it apparently leads
to another galaxy where there may be a planet suitable for mankind to colonise,
abandoning the ravaged Earth. Brand insists that Cooper should lead the mission
to find a new home for all mankind.
The catch, of
course, is that Cooper has no idea of when or if he can ever return.
This emotional
tug of war between Cooper’s desire to fly the mission he was born to lead, and
his love for his children, is not just a plot point; it is actually integral to
the whole story, and leads to the events of the final act, which I will not
reveal here.
Even so, the film
suffers from what appears at first to be an unnecessarily heavy hand pushing
the emotional point home over and over again. To some extent, the payoff at the
end helps to explain this aspect of the narrative, but it takes a long time to
get there.
Along the way, the
film also bogs down in presenting some fairly clumsy philosophical ideas, to
the point of becoming a little ponderous and self important. That sensation is not helped by the imposing
music score, which for much of the film is magnificent, but far too often
intrusive to the point that you cannot hear the dialog. Maybe that was deliberate,
so that the audience doesn’t receive all the exposition too quickly, but it
becomes distracting and annoying at times.
It also doesn’t
help that McConaughey spends the entire film mumbling throughout what is
otherwise a great performance.
The bizarre robot
which accompanies Cooper and his crew into space also takes a little getting
used to. It is like nothing seen on film before, as far as I know, and doesn’t
seem to me to be entirely consistent with the rest of the technology in the
film. The machine moves around with a strange walking motion, and appears to do
so even in the weightlessness of space, which didn’t look right to me.
Nevertheless, the cheerful demeanour of the Artificial Intelligences (yes there’s
more than one of them) in this film make an interesting contrast to the meltdown
of the HAL 9000 computer in the Stanley Kubrick classic “2001: A Space Odyssey.”
The music and the
visual effects are deliberately evocative of “2001,” which in many ways is a
nice touch. It’s no secret that Nolan was tremendously influenced by Kubrick’s
film, and if you are looking for inspiration, you might as well look to the
best. Inevitably, comparisons have been made, and for the most part it’s a fair
call to suggest that Interstellar may be the best space movie since “2001.”
But Kubrick
remains on his pedestal.
Interstellar keeps the story moving forward with some clever
plot turns, and an un-advertised appearance by another major star, but is
hampered by some sequences which slow the pace too much, prompting the viewer to
question whether 169 minutes are really necessary to tell the tale.
The final act has caused some controversy, with some critics
appearing to dislike the ending. Without disclosing details, I actually didn’t
mind the ending. I feel that the most important loose ends were tied up, and
while it might be all just a little bit too neat, let’s remember we are talking
about a Hollywood movie, and the vast bulk of audiences like to leave the
cinema with a sense of completion.
Besides, as I suggested before, the events of the final act
help to explain the mysteries of the first, such as how and why the wormhole
appeared in the first place.
Interstellar is a flawed masterpiece, great at moments, frustrating
at others, but ultimately it’s worth the trip. Perhaps it doesn’t quite live up
to the hype, but given the expectations which preceded its release, that would
have been a very tall order.
No comments:
Post a Comment